Oh I got a check+. It was not, however, on the paper I posted. It was on the previous journal. That journal was basically a analytical writing on a article he gave us. It not only required analysis but also arguement and citation practice. It was a very technical journal. I am glad I earned a check+ on that one. Now on to the check I earned on the journal #4 which is the one I posted. For the record I cant think of a single ounce of information I might have left out of it. The writing is acceptable, still only earning me a check is a little mmmmm. I really am proud of the check though. The journal I posted is basically our thesis for what our final paper will be. Since the posting I have polished it a little and I’m now much more focused on an audience and what kind of information they will require.
So wednesday we officially picked out our topics via that journal and the following friday our first rough draft was due. I freaked at this because I also had a chemistry quiz for that friday. Luckily, I had been doing a little research and already had a good book source for my paper. Well I complained alot, but I finished it thursday afternoon. This left all of thursday night to study for chemistry. When friday rolled around I handed in the paper, after breaking two copier machines. About half the students in the class were absent. The other half though had their papers written also. The two in my study group had pretty good papers. They were both only about 3 pages (minimum required length is 4). One girl didnt realize she had to write it in a specific comparative analysis style, so I showed her in the book where the two examples were. Hers was well written despite not being the correct format. The other fellow had a good paper also. It was about the effects of illegal immigration in some manner.
Thinking about that guys topic just made me want to switch mine to racism. Yesterday I opened the mailbox to find a copy of Newsweek magazine. Rachael’s mother orders this and it still gets sent to our house. Maybe I should start a subscription to the Limbaugh letter and have it mailed to Ron’s. Anyway I just went and got said magazine and I think I’m about to do a practice analysis on this rascism article. So if you are not prepared to read my point of view on the newsweek racism article. You might want to X.
It caught my attention out of the mailbox because It has a giant baby face on it. At first I noticed the baby is white and thought sheesh you evil little white baby. Then I realized they had to use a white baby because the letters used in the title “IS YOUR BABY RACIST?: Exploring the roots of discrimination. are black. Flipping through this magazine is hilarious. Hmm article on Ted kenneday No thanks. Next article is by Jon Meacham who is often on the MSNBC show Morning Joe. It’s about Afghanistan. The international page consisted of Muslims blowing things up in the Caucasus of Russia. (Caucasi?) Finishing with a story on just “Why Leaders in Israel are so Corrupt.”
This brings me to my favorite page in the entire magazine. When I saw it yesterday I almost tore it out. Its on page 17, which starts a section of the magazine called The Take. The first essay of the take is one written by Jonathan Alter, and titled “Cheney’s misguided morality’” I bet you’ll have trouble figuring out Mr. Alter’s point of view. The picture that so anamored me looks like this. Dick Cheney in a suit that undoubtedly costs as much as my car, meaning it looks very nice on him and I’m proud of him for being able to afford it. I am no good at judging the costs of watches. His arm is raised a little in this picture which clearly shows off the mans phat bling watch. Why is his arm raised? His arms is a little raised because he is using that arm to cut a piece of obviously rare steak thats lying on a cutting bord in front of him. The cutting board is just covered in blood. There is so much blood that if you didnt look hard you would think he is operating on a pig. The look on Cheney’s face as he is cutting into this bloody piece of meat is priceless, you can almost see his jowls quiver in anticipation, and his focus reminds me of my dog when she gets a squirrel tree’de, Unwavering. The caption to the pictures reads. “I am” which was cheneys response to the question on Fox News Sunday “So even in theses cases where the CIA investigators went beyond the specific legal authorization your OK with it? I just wish they could have been preparing steak on Fox News Sunday. Then Cheney could have said “I am” and popped a real bloody piece of beef right in his mouth and just held it there with a little pink juice running down his chin.
Ok I am going to abandon this racist thing because my fingers are tired. I got a 100% on my first chemistry quiz.